Performance Measurements of Linux, DanOS, VYOS, VPP, and Linux XDP at 100GE
Tests still being performed - checkVPP backStill atas theyet end of March 2022 for final resultsuntested
Results:
Table below represent Millions of Packets Per Second (MPPS) send for forwarding via the router software vs packetloss of the end destination of expected packets.
Note:
- droptest % represents the % of loss of the legitimate packets
- some higher rates not tested once significant loss was demonstrated at lower levels
- no optimisations performed on these routers unless otherwise noted below
Single-
Single traffic flow Test, 50 firewall policies
- Single destination IP, single protocol, same src/dst port
- 50 Firewall Policies
- % indicates forwarding packetloss
- VYOSXDP is not running any firewall policies as firewall not supported
- LinXDP running custom firewall + 802.1Q
MPPS | ||||||||||||
Danos | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||||||||||
Single-flow w/ 5 blocking rules
Single-flow w/ 50 blocking rules
0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 13.7% | 31.1% | 40.3% | ||||||
0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 28.2% | 46.2% | 57.3% | 65.1% | 70.1% | 74.4% | 80.2% | ||
Single-flow
GRE Test, multiple flows, GRE encapsulations received on other end, fragmentation off
- Random Destination IPs within single /24, multiple src/dst ports, all packets GRE encap
- 50 blockingFirewall rules,policies
- % indicates forwarding packetloss
- LinXDP running custom firewall / GRE tunnel forwardingcode outcome+ 802.1Q
MPPS | ||||||||||||||
Danos | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.8% | 34.3% | 47.8% | 56.7% | 63.1% | |||||
LinXDP | ||||||||||||||
Multiple-flow w/ 50 blocking rules
0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 30.9% | 42.3% | |||||
Multiple-flow
900K Route Test, multiple flows
- Random Destination IPs within single /24, multiple src/dst ports
- 50 blockingFirewall rules,Policies
- 900K% indicates forwarding packetloss
- LinXDP running custom firewall + 802.1Q
- VYOSXDP is not running any firewall policies as firewall not supported
- 900k routes loaded into routing table
MPPS | 30 | |||||||||||
Danos | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 15.1% | 27.0% | 49.2% | ||
12.7% | 24.9% | 30.0% | 43.4% | 59.1% | 65.1% | |||||||
VYOS | 0% | 9.2% | 28.9% | 43.2% | ||||||||
Multiple-flow
DDoS Drop Test (50% traffic dropped)
- Random Destination IPs within single /24, UDP traffic, multiple src/dst ports
- 50 blockingFirewall rules,Policies
- 900K% routes,indicates 50%forwarding packetloss of trafficpackets that were not supposed to be dropped
- LinuxXDP running custom firewall + 802.1Q
- VYOSXDP not tested because it has no firewall capability
- 900k routes loaded into routing table
MPPS | 30 | |||||||||||
Danos | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.6% | 22.5% | 47.2% | |
Test Environment & pktgen tool
Network Card:
mlx5_core 0000:3b:00.1: firmware version: 16.27.6120
mlx5_core 0000:3b:00.1: 126.016 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 8.0 GT/s PCIe x16 link at 0000:3a:00.0 (capable of 252.048 Gb/s with 16.0 GT/s PCIe x16 link)
We wont go into building pktgen as there's plenty of doco out there on this. Just for reference purposes on how we ran pktgen:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib64/ /root/pktgen-dpdk/usr/local/bin/pktgen -l 2,4,6 -n 2 -a 3b:00.1 -d librte_net_mlx5.so -- -p 0x1 -P -m "[4:6].0"
Traffic generated:
Static destination MAC (The test Target)
pktgen:
set 0 rate 10 (This is % of 100GE, adjusted accordingly at 1% = 1.5MPPS)
set 0 size 64
set 0 count 50000000
set 0 proto udp
set 0 dst ip 10.22.23.102
set 0 src ip 10.22.22.101/24
set 0 dst mac XX:XX:XX:XX:d1:7b
set 0 src mac XX:XX:XX:XX:36:75
set 0 type ipv4
Single flow:
Single target IP address
UDP traffic, 64 bytes per packet, same src/dst ports
No firewall policies
Single flow, 5 firewall policies:
Single target IP address
UDP traffic, 64 bytes per packet, same src/dst ports
5 firewall policies
Single flow, 50 firewall policies:
Single target IP address
UDP traffic, 64 bytes per packet, same src/dst ports
50 firewall policies
Single flow, GRE tunnel:
Single target IP address
UDP traffic, 64 bytes per packet, same src/dst ports
50 firewall policies
GRE encap traffic and forward to static destination
Multiple flow:
254 destination IP addresses (multi-flow)
UDP traffic, 64 bytes per packet, random src ports (multi-flow)
50 firewall policies
pktgen:
range 0 src port 53 53 1000 1
range 0 dst ip 10.22.23.1 10.22.23.1 10.22.23.254 0.0.0.1
range 0 src ip 10.22.22.101 10.22.22.101 10.22.22.101 0.0.0.0
range 0 src mac XX:XX:XX:XX:36:75 XX:XX:XX:XX:36:75 XX:XX:XX:XX:36:75 00:00:00:00:00:00
range 0 dst mac XX:XX:XX:XX:d1:7b XX:XX:XX:XX:d1:7b XX:XX:XX:XX:d1:7b 00:00:00:00:00:00
enable 0 range
900K Route Test:
254 destination IP addresses
UDP traffic, 64 bytes per packet, random src/dst ports
50 firewall policies
900K loaded route table
Drop Test:
1 destination IP addresses, multiple ports (multi-flow)
UDP traffic, 64 bytes per packet, random src/dst ports
50 firewall policies, default deny
900K loaded route table
Half test traffic configured to be dropped
DanOS
Version: 2105
Built on: Fri Jun 11 11:58:32 UTC 2021
HW Model: PowerEdge R440
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4210R CPU @ 2.4Ghz
Routing Configuration:
set protocols static arp 10.22.22.101 hwaddr 'XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX'
set protocols static arp 10.22.22.101 interface dp0p59s0f1
set protocols static route 10.22.23.0/24 next-hop 10.22.22.101
Firewall policies:
set security ip-packet-filter group ipv4 ip-version ipv4
set security ip-packet-filter group ipv4 rule 1 action drop
set security ip-packet-filter group ipv4 rule 1 match source ipv4 host 1.1.1.1
set security ip-packet-filter group ipv4 rule 2 action drop
set security ip-packet-filter group ipv4 rule 2 match source ipv4 host 1.1.2.1
set security ip-packet-filter group ipv4 rule 3 action drop
set security ip-packet-filter group ipv4 rule 3 match source ipv4 host 1.1.3.1
...etc...
set security ip-packet-filter interface dp0p59s0f1 in ipv4
For GRE test:
set interfaces tunnel tun0 address 10.90.4.102/24
set interfaces tunnel tun0 encapsulation gre
set interfaces tunnel tun0 local-ip 10.22.22.102
set interfaces tunnel tun0 remote-ip 10.22.22.101
set protocols static route 10.22.23.0/24 next-hop 10.90.4.101
VyOS
$ show system cpu
CPU Vendor: GenuineIntel
Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4210R CPU @ 2.40GHz
Total CPUs: 1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19
Sockets: 2
Cores: 10
Threads: 1
Current MHz: 1000.128
$ show system memory
Total: 62.54 GB
Free: 61.17 GB
Used: 1.38 GB
$ show version
Version: VyOS 1.4-rolling-202203150317
Release train: sagitta
Built by: autobuild@vyos.net
Built on: Tue 15 Mar 2022 03:17 UTC
Build UUID: 9da98191-be0b-42e1-937a-97fb016b22ac
Build commit ID: f2655e2ae72e8c
Architecture: x86_64
Boot via: installed image
System type: bare metal
Hardware vendor: Dell Inc.
Hardware model: PowerEdge R440
Hardware S/N: XXXXXXXXX
Hardware UUID: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Copyright: VyOS maintainers and contributors
Routing Configuration:
set protocols static arp 10.22.22.101 hwaddr 'XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX'
set protocols static route 10.22.23.0/24 next-hop 10.22.22.101
Firewall Policies:
set firewall name TEST_IN rule 1 action 'drop'
set firewall name TEST_IN rule 1 destination address 1.1.1.1
set firewall name TEST_IN rule 2 action 'drop'
set firewall name TEST_IN rule 2 destination address 1.1.2.1
set firewall name TEST_IN rule 3 action 'drop'
set firewall name TEST_IN rule 3 destination address 1.1.3.1
set firewall name TEST_IN rule 4 action 'drop'
set firewall name TEST_IN rule 4 destination address 1.1.4.1
set firewall name TEST_IN rule 5 action 'drop'
set firewall name TEST_IN rule 5 destination address 1.1.5.1
..... etc .....
set interfaces ethernet eth2 firewall in name TEST_IN
For GRE test:
set interfaces tunnel tun0 address '10.90.4.102/24'
set interfaces tunnel tun0 encapsulation 'gre'
set interfaces tunnel tun0 remote '10.22.22.101'
set interfaces tunnel tun0 source-address '10.22.22.102'
set protocols static route 10.22.23.0/24 next-hop 10.90.4.101